[PrintOwners] Canon iR105

[Brian O'Day]

We like it. It doesn't seem any slower than the 105 but cost a lot less. I
was disappointed that it doesn't print any better than the 105. The sales
folks said it would but after talking to a few techs (that's where the real
truth comes from) they say is has the same imaging unit and there is no
reason to think it should print better than the 105. They do say it has some
enhancements that should make it last longer. We have close to two million
impressions on our 7095 and it is doing quite well. 

Brian O'Day
ePrint
Portland, Oregon
brianoday at eprint.us
503-684-2679

-----Original Message-----
From: printowners-bounces at printweb.org
[mailto:printowners-bounces at printweb.org] On Behalf Of john at foxprinting.biz
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:48 AM
To: Discussion List for Printing Business Owners Only
Subject: Re: [PrintOwners] Canon iR105

***** This is a PrintOwners List Message *****

What is your opinion of the 7095?



John Schroeder
Fox Printing
802-658-9196
john at foxprinting.biz





On May 14, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Brian O'Day wrote:

***** This is a PrintOwners List Message *****

We just retired a 105 with 15,000,000 clicks on it. I have to say the 
local
Cannon Service team really tried to keep this up but finally they 
couldn't
resolve a reset error that kept coming up. I had just purchased a 7095 
and
Cannon helped me find a used unit to replace my bad one. It did cost a 
few
thousand dollars however I am still happy with my machine cost. The way 
I
figure it the machine cost after that many copies is .00233333 per 
click. I
can live with that! The high mileage one left and so did my downtime!

Brian O'Day
ePrint
Portland, Oregon
brianoday at eprint.us
503-684-2679






_______________________________________________
PrintOwners Discussion List
Post: PrintOwners at printweb.org
Info: http://rb.enter.net/mailman/listinfo/printowners